Talk:Lisa Kuraki/@comment-25712820-20200609045058/@comment-3218221-20200611235110

The anonymous editor likely removed your edit for two possible reasons:

1. Her sexuality is not defined in-text. Yes, she's exclusively been seen with women so far, but nowhere does the text label her sexuality. Stating, "she's a lesbian" could be incorrect.

2. It's debatable whether your edit belongs in the Personality section, since sexuality isn't a personality trait; at the very least, whoever Clarissa has relations with doesn't reflect anything in particular about her personality. In other words, there's not really a natural way to 'fit' the factoid in her personality section; it doesn't connect to the rest of the description. This is what happens when a story has to include fanservice for the sake of fanservice...

Whether it should and could be added to Trivia is another matter. The chronology will likely make it evident anyway, whenever I or someone else has time to write the 'present' section.

From Chapter 48. Yes, I should have cited it; references section will certainly be added at some point.

While I'm wary of what you mean by 'bothering' and the term 'mixed'--please be mindful--I'll simply reply that the text has made no statement on Clarissa's family outside of what we've read in Chapter 48. And what we've read in Chapter 48 is pretty much the entirety of what you've quoted.